Home · Resources

Working tools, not marketing math.

Three small instruments that show what actuarial work actually produces: a reserve projection, a forward profitability view, and a plain-language reference that returns what you asked for. Adjust the inputs; the numbers respond.

Tool 01 · Reserving

Where a reserve opinion actually begins.

This is a paid-loss development triangle: accident years down, maturity across. The estimator runs a volume-weighted chain ladder: it reads how losses have grown, projects each year out to its ultimate value, and the gap between paid-to-date and ultimate is the indicated IBNR. Edit any blue cell and every projection re-settles. The same engine, with judgment layered on top, sits behind a Statement of Actuarial Opinion.

Paid Loss Development · Chain Ladder Worked example · sample data in $000s
Paid to date
-
Projected ultimate
-
Indicated IBNR
-
IBNR as % of ultimate
-
Paid to date Indicated IBNR (unpaid) Projected development (→)

Worked example using sample figures, shown to illustrate how the chain-ladder method develops losses to ultimate. It is one of several methods an actuary would consider. Illustrative and educational only, not actuarial advice, not a Statement of Actuarial Opinion, and not to be relied upon for any filing or business decision. Terms & Disclaimer →

Tool 02 · Planning & Reinsurance

The exhibit a CEO can read in a minute.

A forward profitability view across a book of business, the kind built originally for a former CEO's monthly review. Set the gross written premium and expected loss ratio for each line, then layer a quota-share treaty on top. The model carries it through to a net combined ratio and underwriting result, and shows exactly how many points the reinsurance moved. This is the translation work: complex terms, one clear answer.

Multi-Line Forward Profitability Figures in $000s · illustrative inputs
Quota-Share Reinsurance & Expenses
Quota-share cessionshare of premium & loss ceded
30%
Ceding commissionpaid back to the cedant on ceded premium
32%
Gross expense ratioacquisition & general expense on gross premium
28%
-
-Net combined
ratio
Gross combined -% · reinsurance effect -
Gross of reinsurance-
Net of reinsurance-
Net premium
-
Ceded premium
-
UW result
-
Loss Expense Underwriting margin 100% break-even

A hypothetical “what-if” planning sketch with illustrative inputs and a simplified treaty structure. Illustrative and educational only — not actuarial advice and not a substitute for a full pricing or reinsurance analysis. Terms & Disclaimer →

Tool 03 · Reference

A search that returns what you asked for.

Property & casualty work runs on a vocabulary that rarely gets explained plainly. This index covers the terms behind reserving, pricing, reinsurance, and the regulatory filings, in language a non-actuary can use in a board meeting. Type a word; results rank instantly by relevance, not by guesswork.

- terms

Plain-language summaries for orientation only — not a substitute for professional actuarial advice on any specific matter. Terms & Disclaimer →

From a tool to a conversation

These are demonstrations. Yours would use your data.

If a reserve review, a profitability exhibit, or a second set of credentialed eyes is on your desk, the first call is simply a scoping call — hourly or fixed-fee, no retainer.

We'll only use this to reply. No retainer, no obligation — just a scoping conversation.

The tools above use illustrative figures for demonstration only. They are not actuarial advice, do not constitute a Statement of Actuarial Opinion, and should not be relied upon for any filing or business decision. See Terms & Disclaimer.